Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 2012

Docket2011-1295

StatusUnpublished

This text of Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc. (Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ANTHONY P. SCHMIDT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, ' V. VERSACOMP, INC. (DOING BUSINESS AS TNT LIFT SYSTEMS), AND RICHARD ULRICH, Defenclants-Cross Appellan,ts. 2o11-1295, -1341 ` Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 08-CV-60084, Judge Adalberto Jordan. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, LINN, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. PER CURLAM. 0 R D E R Versacomp, Inc. and Richard Ulrich (Versacornp) move without opposition for the second time to dismiss Anthony P. Schmidt, Jr.’s appeal for failure to file a brief.

SCI-l'MIDT V. VERSACOMP 2 Versacomp previously moved to dismiss the appeal due to Schmidt’s failure to file a brief. Rather than dis- missing the appeal, this court allowed Schmidt to file a brief no later than October 11, 2011. This court gave Schmidt a strong warning that failure to file a brief by the extended deadline may result in dismissal of his appeal Schmidt has not filed a brief`, nor has he requested an extension of time to file Upon consideration thereof, v IT ls 0RDERED THAT: Versaco1np’s motion to dismiss is granted FOR THE CoURT JAN 12 2312 131 Jan H01-haig Date J an Horbaly Clerk cci Anth0ny P. Schmidt, Jr. U.S. C0UR'i=illFEAi°l’BAlS FOB J0hn B1.ad1ey, ESq‘ THE FEDEHALClRCUlT 324 JAN 122U12 JANHORBAL\' CLEHK Issued As A Mandate: JAN 1 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ANTHONY P. SCHMIDT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, ' V. VERSACOMP, INC. (DOING BUSINESS AS TNT LIFT SYSTEMS), AND RICHARD ULRICH, Defenclants-Cross Appellan,ts. 2o11-1295, -1341 ` Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 08-CV-60084, Judge Adalberto Jordan. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, LINN, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. PER CURLAM. 0 R D E R Versacomp, Inc. and Richard Ulrich (Versacornp) move without opposition for the second time to dismiss Anthony P. Schmidt, Jr.’s appeal for failure to file a brief.

SCI-l'MIDT V. VERSACOMP 2 Versacomp previously moved to dismiss the appeal due to Schmidt’s failure to file a brief. Rather than dis- missing the appeal, this court allowed Schmidt to file a brief no later than October 11, 2011. This court gave Schmidt a strong warning that failure to file a brief by the extended deadline may result in dismissal of his appeal Schmidt has not filed a brief`, nor has he requested an extension of time to file Upon consideration thereof, v IT ls 0RDERED THAT: Versaco1np’s motion to dismiss is granted FOR THE CoURT JAN 12 2312 131 Jan H01-haig Date J an Horbaly Clerk cci Anth0ny P. Schmidt, Jr. U.S. C0UR'i=illFEAi°l’BAlS FOB J0hn B1.ad1ey, ESq‘ THE FEDEHALClRCUlT 324 JAN 122U12 JANHORBAL\' CLEHK Issued As A Mandate: JAN 1 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-versacomp-inc-cafc-2012.