Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.

462 F. App'x 959

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 12, 2012·No. Nos. 2011-1295, 2011-1341·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Versacomp, Inc. and Richard Ulrich (Versacomp) move without opposition for the second time to dismiss Anthony P. [960] Schmidt, Jr.’s appeal for failure to file a brief.

Versacomp previously moved to dismiss the appeal due to Schmidt’s failure to file a brief. Rather than dismissing the appeal, this court allowed Schmidt to file a brief no later than October 11, 2011. This court gave Schmidt a strong warning that failure to file a brief by the extended deadline may result in dismissal of his appeal. Schmidt has not filed a brief, nor has he requested an extension of time to file.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That-.

Versacomp’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Versacomp, Inc. and Richard Ulrich (Versacomp) move without opposition for the second time to dismiss Anthony P. [960] Schmidt, Jr.’s appeal for failure to file a brief.

Versacomp previously moved to dismiss the appeal due to Schmidt’s failure to file a brief. Rather than dismissing the appeal, this court allowed Schmidt to file a brief no later than October 11, 2011. This court gave Schmidt a strong warning that failure to file a brief by the extended deadline may result in dismissal of his appeal. Schmidt has not filed a brief, nor has he requested an extension of time to file.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That-.

Versacomp’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc., 462 F. App'x 959 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

462 F. App'x 959 (Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.