Schmidt v. United States
This text of 97 F. App'x 755 (Schmidt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Connie J. and Lonnie G. Schmidt, and their three children, appeal pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States in the government’s action to reduce federal tax assessments to judgment and to foreclose federal tax liens pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402 and 7403. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s May 30, 2003 order granting summary judgment, and its July 16, 2003 order denying the Schmidts’ Motion to Vacate Judgment and overruling their objections to the proposed Order of Judicial Sale.
[756]*756Appellants’ remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-united-states-ca9-2004.