Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schmidt v. State

Schmidt v. State

837 So. 2d 1077, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1123, 2003 WL 245200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schmidt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2003·No. No. 4D02-3647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to permit appellant to file a rule 3.850 motion within 30 days. See Seabrooks v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmidt v. State, 837 So. 2d 1077, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1123, 2003 WL 245200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

837 So. 2d 1077 (Schmidt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seabrooks v. State
817 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)