Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schmidt v. State

Schmidt v. State

837 So. 2d 1077, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1123, 2003 WL 245200
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-3647
StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 1077 (Schmidt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmidt v. State, 837 So. 2d 1077, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1123, 2003 WL 245200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to permit appellant to file a rule 3.850 motion within 30 days. See Seabrooks v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seabrooks v. State
817 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 1077, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1123, 2003 WL 245200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.