Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schmidt v. State

Schmidt v. State

764 So. 2d 618, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 39, 2000 WL 4834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2000
DocketNo. 99-0322
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 So. 2d 618 (Schmidt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmidt v. State, 764 So. 2d 618, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 39, 2000 WL 4834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l). Contradictory testimony was offered below regarding assurances allegedly made to Schmidt by his counsel. We affirm the resolution of those contradictions made by the trial court, which found the testimony of Schmidt’s counsel more credible.

AFFIRMED.

STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padgett v. State
780 So. 2d 1021 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 So. 2d 618, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 39, 2000 WL 4834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.