Schmidt v. Standard Steel Car Co.

Second Circuit

Schmidt v. Standard Steel Car Co.

202 F. 1023, 120 C.C.A. 664, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1913

DocketNo. 186

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 F. 1023 (Schmidt v. Standard Steel Car Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. Standard Steel Car Co., 202 F. 1023, 120 C.C.A. 664, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105 (2d Cir. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tbe parties having stipulated seasonably for settlement of tbe bill of exceptions, we are satisfied that tbe trial judge should have signed it, even though the term had expired. Waldron v. Waldron, 156 U. S. 361, 15 Sup. Ct. 383, 39 L. Ed. 453. Under the provisions of Rev. Stat. U. S. § 953, as amended by Act June 5, 1900, c. 717, § 1, 31 Stat. 270 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 696), the bill of exceptions may, in case of the disability of the trial judge, be signed, by any other judge of the court in which the trial was had. We assume that the bill of exceptions in this case will be so signed, and, on being advised that it has been, are prepared to deny this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tbe parties having stipulated seasonably for settlement of tbe bill of exceptions, we are satisfied that tbe trial judge should have signed it, even though the term had expired. Waldron v. Waldron, 156 U. S. 361, 15 Sup. Ct. 383, 39 L. Ed. 453. Under the provisions of Rev. Stat. U. S. § 953, as amended by Act June 5, 1900, c. 717, § 1, 31 Stat. 270 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 696), the bill of exceptions may, in case of the disability of the trial judge, be signed, by any other judge of the court in which the trial was had. We assume that the bill of exceptions in this case will be so signed, and, on being advised that it has been, are prepared to deny this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 F. 1023, 120 C.C.A. 664, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-standard-steel-car-co-ca2-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack