Schmidt v. Schmidt
159 A.D.2d 1002, 555 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3320
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schmidt v. Schmidt. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 A.D.2d 629 →
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find no basis to disturb Family Court’s award of primary physical custody to respondent (see, Matter of Blank v Blank, 124 AD2d 1010; Pawelski v Buchholtz, 91 AD2d 1200). (Appeal from order of Livingston County Family Court, Cicoria, J. — custody.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmidt v. Schmidt, 159 A.D.2d 1002, 555 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
159 A.D.2d 1002 (Schmidt v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pawelski v. Buchholtz
91 A.D.2d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Blank v. Blank
124 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)