Schmidt v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Schmidt v. McCarthy

46 N.W. 239, 43 Minn. 288, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 186

DecidedMay 16, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.W. 239 (Schmidt v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. McCarthy, 46 N.W. 239, 43 Minn. 288, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 186 (Mich. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

There is no merit in either assignment of error. Even had defendant been technically entitled, as a part of his cross-examination of the witness Mrs. McCarthy, to ask the questions which the court below excluded, it is apparent that he could not have been prejudiced by their exclusion. They were so manifestly immaterial that no conceivable answers that the witness might have made could in any way have affected the result.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilfillan, C. J.

There is no merit in either assignment of error. Even had defendant been technically entitled, as a part of his cross-examination of the witness Mrs. McCarthy, to ask the questions which the court below excluded, it is apparent that he could not have been prejudiced by their exclusion. They were so manifestly immaterial that no conceivable answers that the witness might have made could in any way have affected the result.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.W. 239, 43 Minn. 288, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-mccarthy-minn-1890.