Schmidt v. McCaffrey

70 N.Y.S. 1011, 34 Misc. 693
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GAYUOR, J.

Section 538 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that “a sham answer or a sham defence may be stricken out,” etc. This distinguishes an “answer” and a “defence'’ as separate things in the terminology of pleading, whereas the term “answer” includes the term “defence,” An answer may consist of a denial or denials only, or of a “defence” only, or of both. Code Civ. Proc. § 500. But a denial cannot be struck out as sham, i. e., false, but only a “defence.” Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281. This serves to illustrate the. differ[1012] ence in terminology between a “denial” and a defence.” The inexact and Unscientific language of the Code ought to be that a “defence” may be struck out as sham. There are no defences pleaded here, but only a general denial.

The motion is denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmidt v. McCaffrey, 70 N.Y.S. 1011, 34 Misc. 693 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

70 N.Y.S. 1011 (Schmidt v. McCaffrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oak Lane Country Day School v. Virginia Fire & Marine Insurance
8 Pa. D. & C. 194 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)