Schmidt v. Klein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schmidt v. Klein

204 S.W.3d 286, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2006 WL 2597993

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 2006·No. No. ED 87022·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Schmidt appeals the trial court’s judgment calculating the sum for necessaries Schmidt owed Freddie Klein. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Schmidt appeals the trial court’s judgment calculating the sum for necessaries Schmidt owed Freddie Klein. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Schmidt v. Klein, 204 S.W.3d 286, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1358, 2006 WL 2597993 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 286 (Schmidt v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.