Schmidt v. Hunsberger

615 F. App'x 808
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. No. 15-1340·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s orders consolidating his cases against Officers Steven Hunsberger and John Burk and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints against the officers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th [809]*809Cir.1977) (identifying district court’s broad discretion in consolidation issues); United States v. Buckner, 473 F.3d 551, 554-55 (4th Cir.2007) (discussing apparent authority to consent to search). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmidt v. Hunsberger, 615 F. App'x 808 (4th Cir. 2015).

615 F. App'x 808 (Schmidt v. Hunsberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related