Schmidt v. Howard Johnson Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schmidt v. Howard Johnson Co.

342 So. 2d 992, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1977

DocketNo. 76-248

StatusPublished

This text of 342 So. 2d 992 (Schmidt v. Howard Johnson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. Howard Johnson Co., 342 So. 2d 992, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Rose Ann Schmidt, as personal representative of the estate of Donald E. Schmidt, deceased, from a final order of dismissal in a wrongful death action wherein the appellees, Howard Johnson Company and Insurance Company of North America, were the defendants.

We affirm on the authority of Section 440.11, Florida Statutes. Also see Murray v. Osenton, 126 So.2d 603 (Fla.2d DCA 1961).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Rose Ann Schmidt, as personal representative of the estate of Donald E. Schmidt, deceased, from a final order of dismissal in a wrongful death action wherein the appellees, Howard Johnson Company and Insurance Company of North America, were the defendants.

We affirm on the authority of Section 440.11, Florida Statutes. Also see Murray v. Osenton, 126 So.2d 603 (Fla.2d DCA 1961).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 So. 2d 992, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-howard-johnson-co-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack