Schmidt v. Hall Baking Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schmidt v. Hall Baking Co.

252 A.D. 922, 300 N.Y.S. 68, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 922 (Schmidt v. Hall Baking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. Hall Baking Co., 252 A.D. 922, 300 N.Y.S. 68, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $500 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained by eating moldy fruit cake. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Bdgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $500 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained by eating moldy fruit cake. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Bdgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 922, 300 N.Y.S. 68, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-hall-baking-co-nyappdiv-1937.