Schmidt v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schmidt v. Globe Indemnity Co.

40 A.D.2d 1041, 339 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 1041 (Schmidt v. Globe Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schmidt v. Globe Indemnity Co., 40 A.D.2d 1041, 339 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment and other relief, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 17, 1971, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a decretal paragraph [1042]*1042declaring that on the record before the court defendants are not required to defend plaintiff in the action pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York (Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334). As so modified, judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur; Munder, Acting P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment and other relief, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 17, 1971, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a decretal paragraph [1042]*1042declaring that on the record before the court defendants are not required to defend plaintiff in the action pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York (Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334). As so modified, judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur; Munder, Acting P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 1041, 339 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-globe-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1972.