Schmidt v. Dubin
Opinion
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 15-APR-2024 08:00 AM Dkt. 99 ODMR
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
THOMAS SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
GARY VICTOR DUBIN; DUBIN LAW OFFICES, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and
JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants, and
GARY VICTOR DUBIN; DUBIN LAW OFFICES, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v.
JOHN S. CARROLL,
Third-Party Defendant/Third-Party Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 15-1-0482)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER [JEFS 87], FILED MARCH 28, 2024
(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the "Motion for Reconsideration
of Summary Disposition Order [JEFS 87], Filed March 28, 2024"
(Motion) filed herein on April 5, 2024, and the records and files
herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 15, 2024.
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmidt v. Dubin (Schmidt v. Dubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.