Schmidt v. Dubin
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
18-JUL-2024
01:13 PM
Dkt. 21 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
THOMAS SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
GARY VICTOR DUBIN; DUBIN LAW OFFICES, Respondents/Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/ Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,
and
GARY VICTOR DUBIN; DUBIN LAW OFFICES, Respondents/Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/ Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,
vs.
JOHN S. CARROL,
Respondent/Third-Party Defendant/ Third-Party Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC151000482)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kawano, in place of Devens, J., recused)
Petitioner Thomas Schmidt's Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on June 18, 2024, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, July 18, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Kelsey T. Kawano
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmidt v. Dubin (Schmidt v. Dubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.