Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1607
HARALD SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: February 8, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Metcoff Klaus, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s order,
inter alia, confirming an arbitration award and awarding
attorneys’ fees and expenses in favor of Citibank (South
Dakota) N.A. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Schmidt v. Citibank, No. 1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA
(E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.