Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2010·No. 09-1607·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1607

HARALD SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA)

Submitted: February 8, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2010

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Metcoff Klaus, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s order,

inter alia, confirming an arbitration award and awarding

attorneys’ fees and expenses in favor of Citibank (South

Dakota) N.A. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Schmidt v. Citibank, No. 1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA

(E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., (4th Cir. 2010).

Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.