Schmidt v. Carroll
This text of Schmidt v. Carroll (Schmidt v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000400 08-AUG-2016 09:25 AM
SCWC-15-0000400
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DARREN TODD SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
COURTNEY MARIE CARROLL, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000400; FC-M. NO. 12-1-0003)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on June 26, 2016, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 8, 2016.
Harry Eliason /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schmidt v. Carroll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-carroll-haw-2016.