Schmidt v. Bodin

273 F. App'x 570
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2008·No. No. 07-3155·Published

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Janis Schmidt challenges the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se action. We agree that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmidt v. Bodin, 273 F. App'x 570 (8th Cir. 2008).

273 F. App'x 570 (Schmidt v. Bodin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.