Schmidt v. Big Boy

Eighth Circuit

Schmidt v. Big Boy

272 F. App'x 536

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2008·No. Nos. 07-1857, 07-2457·Published

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Janis Schmidt challenges the district court’s¹ adverse judgment disposing of her pro se lawsuit. After careful review, we affirm the judgment in case number 07-1857 and we dismiss case number 07-2457 for lack of jurisdiction. See Berdella v. Delo, 972 F.2d 204, 207 n. 5 (8th Cir.1992). We also deny all pending motions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Janis Schmidt challenges the district court’s¹ adverse judgment disposing of her pro se lawsuit. After careful review, we affirm the judgment in case number 07-1857 and we dismiss case number 07-2457 for lack of jurisdiction. See Berdella v. Delo, 972 F.2d 204, 207 n. 5 (8th Cir.1992). We also deny all pending motions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Schmidt v. Big Boy, 272 F. App'x 536 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

272 F. App'x 536 (Schmidt v. Big Boy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related