Home/U.S. Customs Court/Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United States

Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 396
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 2, 1962
DocketNo. 66649; protest 60/28876 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 396 (Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 396 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

[397]*397Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as 1,033 cartons frozen boneless mutton, is similar in all material respects to the beef the subject of United States v. J. H. Brown et al. (46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), except that the merchandise here involved is mutton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brown
46 C.C.P.A. 1 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-pritchard-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.