Schmid v. Law
87 A. 452, 83 N.J.L. 635, 54 Vroom 635, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 201
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Garrison.
[636]*636For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Swayze, Trench-, art), Parker, Bergen, ' Voorhbes, ' Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vrbdenburgh, Vroom, Oongdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.
For reversal — JSTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmid v. Law, 87 A. 452, 83 N.J.L. 635, 54 Vroom 635, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 201 (N.J. 1912).
87 A. 452 (Schmid v. Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.