Schmid v. Arthur
This text of 3 A.D.2d 983 (Schmid v. Arthur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of Onondaga County Court affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court affirming a judgment of a Justice’s Court of the Town of Salina which awarded possession of the premises to the landlord, together with judgment of $325. The order is the order of affirmance.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Goldman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 983, 162 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmid-v-arthur-nyappdiv-1957.