Schmick v. Comm'r

2007 T.C. Memo. 220, 94 T.C.M. 149, 2007 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedAugust 8, 2007
DocketNo. 15846-06
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2007 T.C. Memo. 220 (Schmick v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmick v. Comm'r, 2007 T.C. Memo. 220, 94 T.C.M. 149, 2007 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221 (tax 2007).

Opinion

JUDITH E. SCHMICK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Schmick v. Comm'r
No. 15846-06
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2007-220; 2007 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221; 94 T.C.M. (CCH) 149;
August 8, 2007, Filed
*221
Judith E. Schmick, Pro se.
Julie A. Jebe, for respondent.
Ruwe, Robert P.

ROBERT J. RUWE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUWE, Judge: On August 15, 2006, petitioner timely filed a petition under section 6015(e)1 seeking review of respondent's final determination denying her relief from joint and several liability under section 6015 for the tax years 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. On October 11, 2006, petitioner filed a Motion to Change Case to a "Small Tax Case". Section 7463 generally allows disputes in small tax cases to be decided in proceedings in which the normally applicable procedural and evidentiary rules are relaxed. See Rule 174(b). Section 7463(f)(1) authorizes use of the small tax case procedures "in the case of * * * a petition to the Tax Court under section 6015(e) in which the amount of relief sought does not exceed $ 50,000". By Order dated November 30, 2006, this Court directed petitioner to file, on or before December 21, 2006, a supplement to her motion filed October 11, 2006, setting forth whether the amount of relief sought in this case exceeds the $ 50,000 limit under section 7463(f)(1). Petitioner failed to timely respond to the Court's Order, and the Court denied her Motion *222 to Change Case to a "Small Tax Case" on January 12, 2007.

On February 8, 2007, petitioner filed another Motion to Change Case to a "Small Tax Case". Petitioner attached a copy of Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, that she submitted on February 24, 2006. On the Form 8857, she explained: "We are asking for relief for the following amounts" listed as follows:

YearAmount
1997$ 22,141.54
199912,025.26
200011,468.46
20016,673.95
2002   7,027.12
Total59,336.33

Petitioner also attached IRS account transcripts for each of the years in issue indicating that her unpaid tax liabilities (including interest and penalties) as of January 2007 exceeded $ 61,000. Nevertheless, in her February 8, 2007, motion, petitioner states that "Without penalties and interest *223 the amount in issue is $ 32,059.48 & does not exceed $ 50,000".

On July 24, 2007, this Court held that the amount of relief sought for purposes of section 7463(f)(1) includes the total amount of tax, interest, and penalties, including accrued but unassessed interest and penalties, for which relief is sought in the petition calculated as of the date the petition is filed. Petrane v. Commissioner, 129 T.C. 1, 129 T.C. 1, 2007 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 19, 129 T.C. No. 1 (2007). In Petrane, we reasoned:

interest and penalties are generally treated as tax, and any reference in the Internal Revenue Code to "tax" (with exceptions not applicable to this case) shall be deemed to include interest and penalties. Secs. 6601(e)(1), 6665(a);

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petrane v. Comm'r
129 T.C. No. 1 (U.S. Tax Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2007 T.C. Memo. 220, 94 T.C.M. 149, 2007 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmick-v-commr-tax-2007.