SCHMEDEKE v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

SCHMEDEKE v. State

179 S.W.3d 307, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1747, 2005 WL 3159695

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SCHMEDEKE v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 811 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2005·No. ED 85293·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James J. Schmedeke (“Appellant”) appeals from the decision of the trial court, denying Appellant’s Rule 29.15 Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence, after a jury convicted him of Driving While Intoxicated, in violation of Section 577.101 RSMo. (2000), 1 and Driving While Revoked, in violation of Section 302.321, in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The *308 judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

1

. All Statutory references are to RSMo. (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James J. Schmedeke (“Appellant”) appeals from the decision of the trial court, denying Appellant’s Rule 29.15 Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence, after a jury convicted him of Driving While Intoxicated, in violation of Section 577.101 RSMo. (2000), 1 and Driving While Revoked, in violation of Section 302.321, in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The *308 judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

1

. All Statutory references are to RSMo. (2000).

SCHMEDEKE v. State, 179 S.W.3d 307, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1747, 2005 WL 3159695 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

179 S.W.3d 307 (SCHMEDEKE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.