Schmalz v. Schmalz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Schmalz v. Schmalz

84 So. 166, 146 La. 876, 1920 La. LEXIS 1793

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 1, 1920·No. No. 23487·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

O’NIELL, J.

[1, 2] The defendant appeals from a judgment of separation granting his [877]*877wife the custody and control of their minor children. The judgment is supported by un-contradicted evidence, making absolute proof, that the defendant defamed his wife and treated her so cruelly that her living with him became intolerable. No argument has been made, or reason advanced, for annulling the decree.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, J.

[1, 2] The defendant appeals from a judgment of separation granting his [877]*877wife the custody and control of their minor children. The judgment is supported by un-contradicted evidence, making absolute proof, that the defendant defamed his wife and treated her so cruelly that her living with him became intolerable. No argument has been made, or reason advanced, for annulling the decree.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Schmalz v. Schmalz, 84 So. 166, 146 La. 876, 1920 La. LEXIS 1793 (La. 1920).

Pincite

84 So. 166 (Schmalz v. Schmalz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related