Schmaltz v. MICHIGAN TRACTOR AND MACHINERY CO.
This text of 689 N.W.2d 231 (Schmaltz v. MICHIGAN TRACTOR AND MACHINERY CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCHMALTZ
v.
MICHIGAN TRACTOR AND MACHINERY CO.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 124037, COA: 237991.
By order of December 30, 2003, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Ormsby v. Capital Welding (Docket Nos. 123287, 123289). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on July 23, 2004, 471 Mich. 45, 684 N.W.2d 320 (2004), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the issues related to the common work area doctrine in light of Ormsby. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 N.W.2d 231, 471 Mich. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmaltz-v-michigan-tractor-and-machinery-co-mich-2004.