Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schmaeling v. Cook

Schmaeling v. Cook

18 A.D.3d 730, 794 N.Y.S.2d 921
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 730 (Schmaeling v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmaeling v. Cook, 18 A.D.3d 730, 794 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Huttner, J.), dated April 27, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff James Schmaeling and against her in the principal sum of $155,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular facts of this case, the errors claimed by the defendant were not so fundamental in nature as to warrant a new trial (see McIntosh v City of New York, 13 AD3d 421, 422 [2004]; Rockowitz v Greenstein, 11 AD3d 523, 524 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P, Santucci, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rockowitz v. Greenstein
11 A.D.3d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
McIntosh v. City of New York
13 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.3d 730, 794 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmaeling-v-cook-nyappdiv-2005.