Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schlussel v. Kanaley

Schlussel v. Kanaley

261 A.D. 1090, 27 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 14, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1090 (Schlussel v. Kanaley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlussel v. Kanaley, 261 A.D. 1090, 27 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order denying motion of appellants to vacate a notice of examination before trial of appellant Henry Brandt, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed at Special Term, Part II, Supreme Court, Kings County, on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1090, 27 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlussel-v-kanaley-nyappdiv-1941.