Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States
This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 433 (Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, of Sample taker guns, which are articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; that said merchandise is not suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, or parts of equipment suitable for such use; and that if the entry were now before the collector, it would have been so classified, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Cust. Ct. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlumberger-well-surveying-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1956.