Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 433

United States Customs Court·Decided May 17, 1956·No. No. 59920; protest 183983-K (Galveston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, of Sample taker guns, which are articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; that said merchandise is not suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, or parts of equipment suitable for such use; and that if the entry were now before the collector, it would have been so classified, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, of Sample taker guns, which are articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; that said merchandise is not suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, or parts of equipment suitable for such use; and that if the entry were now before the collector, it would have been so classified, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 433 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 433 (Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.