Schlumberger Technology Corporation and John Thomas Murphy v. Otila Cuellar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rudolph Gonzalez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 2009
Docket13-07-00298-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Schlumberger Technology Corporation and John Thomas Murphy v. Otila Cuellar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rudolph Gonzalez (Schlumberger Technology Corporation and John Thomas Murphy v. Otila Cuellar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rudolph Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlumberger Technology Corporation and John Thomas Murphy v. Otila Cuellar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rudolph Gonzalez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-00298-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG




SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION AND JOHN THOMAS MURPHY, Appellants,



v.



OTILA CUELLAR, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF RUDOLPH GONZALEZ, DECEASED, Appellee.



On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



This case is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. The parties request this Court set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. Without passing on the merits of the case, we set aside the trial court's judgment and REMAND this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). The parties' joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, each party is ORDERED to bear their own costs.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 15th day of January, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schlumberger Technology Corporation and John Thomas Murphy v. Otila Cuellar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rudolph Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlumberger-technology-corporation-and-john-thoma-texapp-2009.