Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2014
Docket01-14-00776-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford (Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford

Appellate case number: 01-14-00776-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-13621

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Appellants/cross-appellees Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“Schlumberger”) and appellee/cross-appellant Charlotte Rutherford have filed a “Joint Agreed Motion to Adopt Briefing Schedule and Aggregate Word Limit” proposing a briefing schedule and aggregate word limit. The joint order is granted, and the briefing schedule in this case is as follows:  Schlumberger’s opening brief as appellants and Rutherford’s opening brief as cross-appellant are due by November 19, 2014.  Schlumberger’s response brief as cross-appellees and Rutherford’s response brief as appellee are due by January 9, 2015.  Schlumberger’s reply brief as appellants and Rutherford’s reply brief as cross- appellant are due by February 18, 2015. The aggregate word limit for all briefs filed by each side shall be extended to 37,500 words per side. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(4). Opening and response briefs may not exceed 15,000 words and reply briefs may not exceed 7,500 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B), (C). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 21, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte Rutherford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlumberger-limited-and-schlumberger-technology-c-texapp-2014.