Schluer v. Jamaica Water Supply Co.
This text of 247 A.D. 899 (Schluer v. Jamaica Water Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for an order striking out the answer and counterclaim of the defendant, or portions thereof, and for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rules 103, 104, 109 and 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of striking out paragraph fifth as irrelevant. In [900]*900our opinion the previous location of the hydrant has no relevancy in this litigation. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schluer-v-jamaica-water-supply-co-nyappdiv-1936.