Schluckebier v. Babcock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Schluckebier v. Babcock

80 N.W. 435, 104 Wis. 293, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 267

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 20, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 N.W. 435 (Schluckebier v. Babcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schluckebier v. Babcock, 80 N.W. 435, 104 Wis. 293, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 267 (Wis. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Dodge, J.

The record not only fails to show any adequate excuse for the delay for more than six months from ihe entry of the judgment, but it also fails wholly to show that a bill of exceptions could be of any advantage to the appellants if settled. Upon no subject is the discretion of the trial court broader than upon applications by parties in , default for favors and extensions of time in matters of mere procedure, such as this. ¥e discover no abuse of such discretion here.

By the Oourt.— Order appealed from affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodge, J.

The record not only fails to show any adequate excuse for the delay for more than six months from ihe entry of the judgment, but it also fails wholly to show that a bill of exceptions could be of any advantage to the appellants if settled. Upon no subject is the discretion of the trial court broader than upon applications by parties in , default for favors and extensions of time in matters of mere procedure, such as this. ¥e discover no abuse of such discretion here.

By the Oourt.— Order appealed from affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 N.W. 435, 104 Wis. 293, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schluckebier-v-babcock-wis-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack