Schluckebier v. Babcock
80 N.W. 435, 104 Wis. 293, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 267
Opinion
The record not only fails to show any adequate excuse for the delay for more than six months from ihe entry of the judgment, but it also fails wholly to show that a bill of exceptions could be of any advantage to the appellants if settled. Upon no subject is the discretion of the trial court broader than upon applications by parties in , default for favors and extensions of time in matters of mere procedure, such as this. ¥e discover no abuse of such discretion here.
By the Oourt.— Order appealed from affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schluckebier v. Babcock, 80 N.W. 435, 104 Wis. 293, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 267 (Wis. 1899).
80 N.W. 435 (Schluckebier v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ward v. Board of Trustees of Racine College
185 N.W. 635 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
McElroy v. Minnesota Percheron Horse Co.
85 N.W. 119 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)