Schlossman v. State

676 A.2d 513, 342 Md. 403, 1996 Md. LEXIS 49, 1996 WL 264768
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 16, 1996
DocketNo. 112
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 676 A.2d 513 (Schlossman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlossman v. State, 676 A.2d 513, 342 Md. 403, 1996 Md. LEXIS 49, 1996 WL 264768 (Md. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prior report: 105 Md.App. 277, 659 A.2d 371.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 16th day of May, 1996.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tolan v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2019
Johnson v. State
115 A.3d 668 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2015)
Bailey v. State
734 A.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1999)
Ashe v. State
726 A.2d 786 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1999)
Sippio v. State
714 A.2d 864 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
State v. Yarborough
1996 NMSC 068 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 A.2d 513, 342 Md. 403, 1996 Md. LEXIS 49, 1996 WL 264768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlossman-v-state-md-1996.