Schlossman v. Schlossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schlossman v. Schlossman

44 A.D.2d 608, 353 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 608 (Schlossman v. Schlossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlossman v. Schlossman, 44 A.D.2d 608, 353 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the 'Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered September 6, 1973, as granted plaintiff alimony pendente lite. Order modified by reducing the temporary alimony award to $200 a week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. We have repeatedly stated that the remedy for any seeming inequity in a direction for the payment of temporary alimony based upon conflicting affidavits is a speedy trial, where the facts relating to finances and the parties’ standard of living may be adequately developed and determined (Dubowsky v. Dubowsky, 41 A D 2d 769). In any event, upon the present record, the temporary alimony award, $250 a week, was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the 'Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered September 6, 1973, as granted plaintiff alimony pendente lite. Order modified by reducing the temporary alimony award to $200 a week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. We have repeatedly stated that the remedy for any seeming inequity in a direction for the payment of temporary alimony based upon conflicting affidavits is a speedy trial, where the facts relating to finances and the parties’ standard of living may be adequately developed and determined (Dubowsky v. Dubowsky, 41 A D 2d 769). In any event, upon the present record, the temporary alimony award, $250 a week, was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 608, 353 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlossman-v-schlossman-nyappdiv-1974.