Schloss v. Zentman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schloss v. Zentman

286 A.D.2d 462, 730 N.Y.S.2d 251

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 462 (Schloss v. Zentman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schloss v. Zentman, 286 A.D.2d 462, 730 N.Y.S.2d 251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In two proceedings pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions for an opportunity to ballot by providing for write-in candidates pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in primary elections to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nominations of (1) the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office of Rockland County Legislator for the Sixth Legislative District, and (2) the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Rockland County Legislator for the Sixth Legislative District, the petitioner in both proceedings appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), entered August 8, 2001, as denied the petitions and dismissed the proceedings.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons stated in Matter of Mullane v Bauer (286 AD2d 460 [decided herewith]). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In two proceedings pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions for an opportunity to ballot by providing for write-in candidates pursuant to Election Law § 6-164 in primary elections to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nominations of (1) the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office of Rockland County Legislator for the Sixth Legislative District, and (2) the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Rockland County Legislator for the Sixth Legislative District, the petitioner in both proceedings appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), entered August 8, 2001, as denied the petitions and dismissed the proceedings.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons stated in Matter of Mullane v Bauer (286 AD2d 460 [decided herewith]). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 462, 730 N.Y.S.2d 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schloss-v-zentman-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack