Schloesser v. Owen

134 Cal. 546
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 1901
DocketSac. No. 855
StatusPublished

This text of 134 Cal. 546 (Schloesser v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schloesser v. Owen, 134 Cal. 546 (Cal. 1901).

Opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

Motions to dismiss appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial. The undertaking on the appeal from the judgment was not filed .until thirty days after the notice of appeal was served and filed, but it was filed within the time as extended by order of the judge of the court, and it has been decided that the court or judge has the power to make such an order. ( Wadsworth v. Wadsworth, 74 Cal. 104.) iWt decision has never been questioned, and we see no reason to question it. The proof of service of the notices of appeal, if defective originally, is cured by the affidavit filed in pursuance of leave granted at the hearing.

The motions are denied.

McFarland, J., Garoutte, J., Harrison, J., Temple, J., and Van Dyke, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth
15 P. 447 (California Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 Cal. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schloesser-v-owen-cal-1901.