Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc.

231 N.W. 209, 180 Minn. 492, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1270
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 29, 1930·No. No. 27,963.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant is a Minnesota corporation and appeals from an order appointing a receiver for it. Plaintiff is a judgment creditor upon whose judgment an execution has been returned unsatisfied. The only claims here are that notice of the motion for the appointment of a receiver was given January 16, 1930, for a hearing on January 22, and that “proper service was not obtained upon the defendant company.” The trouble is that defendant appeared generally in opposition to the motion without suggesting that there was. any defect in the service of the notice or that timely service was not made. Having so appeared without objection, defendant could not thereafter aver want of jurisdiction.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc., 231 N.W. 209, 180 Minn. 492, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1270 (Mich. 1930).

231 N.W. 209 (Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rust
98 N.W.2d 271 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)