Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc.
This text of 231 N.W. 209 (Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant is a Minnesota corporation and appeals from an order appointing a receiver for it. Plaintiff is a judgment creditor upon whose judgment an execution has been returned unsatisfied. The only claims here are that notice of the motion for the appointment of a receiver was given January 16, 1930, for a hearing on January 22, and that “proper service was not obtained upon the defendant company.” The trouble is that defendant appeared generally in opposition to the motion without suggesting that there was. any defect in the service of the notice or that timely service was not made. Having so appeared without objection, defendant could not thereafter aver want of jurisdiction.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 N.W. 209, 180 Minn. 492, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlitz-commercial-co-v-good-will-league-inc-minn-1930.