Schlittler, David

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 2016
DocketPD-1505-14
StatusPublished

This text of Schlittler, David (Schlittler, David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlittler, David, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

June 16, 2016

FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ,Mr Abel Acosta Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals HIM PO 9niR po box 12308 Juntumb Capitol Station Austin, tx 78711 Abel Acosta, Clerk

RE: Schlittler v State CCA No. PD-1505-14 Trial Court Case No. 30390

Dear Mr Acosta;

Please find enclosed, my Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Would vou

please file these in the matter and promptly bring them to the Honorable Courts

attention for consideration of same.

Thank you, in advance, for vour help!

Respectfully,

David Schlittler # 1498090 Lynaugh Unit 1098 S Hwy 2037 Ft Stockton, TX 79735

cc: Ms Lisa C^Mcmnn State Eifosecuting Attorney P 0 Bfrc 13406 Austin, TX 78711

Ms Melinc&'Fletcher Special Prosecution Unit P,,0Jbx 1744 frillo, TX 79105 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NO. PD1505-14

APPEAL CAUSE NO. 12-13-00269-CR

DAVID C SCHLITTLER § IN THE COURT OF Appellant § § V. § CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee § AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, David C Schlittler, Appellant Prose in the above Cause Numbers,

with this Motion for An Appointment of Counsel pursuant to Rule 2 & 10.1, Texas

Rules of Appellant Procedure & respectfully shows unto the Court:

Appellant filed a Prose Motion for an Out of Time Motion for Rehearing

requesting the Honorable Court consider the fundamental rights violated in

the prosecution of the matter, but which were not presented for review.

The Court granted the motion & withdrew its May 23, 2016 Mandate on June

6, 2016, allowing AoDellant until July 12, 2016 to file the brief.

II.

This Court has Dreviouslv held that a Motion for Rehearin? mav he consi

dered to decide an issue not presented in an original brief! See Hushes v

State. 878 SW2d 142. 151 (TCA1992).

The review of these fundamental rights is DroDer and as such, it gives

the Appellate Courts an opportunity to examine the issues ovephg^j©P *nus__.A, c rv CRIMINAL fcPPE*1* promoting efficiency in the legal system & would ber^UBe* wtbrest of iustice.

JUM 20 a»

^el Acosta,Clerk III.

Appellant, having iust received the granting of his motion, instantly

brings this motion due to the great respect for the Courts precious time &

understands that brief writing is a 'learned' science. Therefore, as a layman,

unskilled & uneducated in law, offers that the assistance of a competent att

orney skilled in constitutional law, would be best at briefing the merit's concisely & as briefly as possible, so as to allow the Court proper argument

and case citings saving the Court time in determining the constitutional claims.

IV.

Recognizing that a rehearing can be used to bring issues which were not

brought in an original appellant brief, is a reference to the appeal. There

fore, appointed assistance would be made an indigent unless the waiver of same was given. Appellant was appointed counsel for the appeal and does not silently

waive the close assistance of counsel for briefing this matter.

Appellant recognizes "tferight to be heard would be, in many cases, of

little avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by counsel."

PowellwAlabama, 287 US 45 (1932).

V,

WHEREFORE CONSIDERED, Appellant prays the Court grant this motion

appointing an attorney for this proceeding for good cause & to expidite a de

cision on the constitutional deprivations as applied to Appellant which were

not Dresented or considered in the original brief & that has importance in

not only Appellant's case, but others, who may be similarly situated. Respectfully submitted.

David Schlittler TDCJ # 1498090 Lynaugh Unit 1098 S Hwv 2037 Ft Stockton, TX 79735

Appellant, Prose

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

T certify that a true and correct copy of the Motion for An Appointment

of Counsel has been served upon the parties below, by placing same in a postage

prepaid envelope, and dspositing same in the Lynaugh Unit's mail system on this, the 16th day of June, 2016.

Ms Lisa C McMirm State Prosecuting Attorney P 0 Box 13046 Austin, TX 78711

Ms Melinda Fletcher Special Prosecution Uinit P 0 Box 1744 Amarildo, TX 79105

David Schlittler

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powell v. Alabama
287 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Hughes v. State
878 S.W.2d 142 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schlittler, David, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlittler-david-texapp-2016.