Schlierbach v. City of Pana

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schlierbach v. City of Pana

13 Ill. App. 382, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 71

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedSeptember 21, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 Ill. App. 382 (Schlierbach v. City of Pana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlierbach v. City of Pana, 13 Ill. App. 382, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 71 (Ill. Ct. App. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a proceeding in the county court to make a special assessment upon contiguous property for the purpose of improving one of the public streets of the city of Pana. The court having appointed commissioners to make the assessment and their report having been filed, appellants appeared and filed objections to its confirmation. A jury trial was had which resulted in a confirmation of the report of the commissioners, and a judgment against appellants for costs. From, the order confirming the report of the commissioners and said judgment for costs this appeal was taken.

This is a case relating to the revenue and this court can not take jurisdiction of it: Potwin v. Johnson, 106 Ill. 532; The People, etc., v. Springer, Ibid. 542; Herhold v. City of Chicago, Ibid. 547; Webster v. The People, etc., 98 Ill. 343.

The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a proceeding in the county court to make a special assessment upon contiguous property for the purpose of improving one of the public streets of the city of Pana. The court having appointed commissioners to make the assessment and their report having been filed, appellants appeared and filed objections to its confirmation. A jury trial was had which resulted in a confirmation of the report of the commissioners, and a judgment against appellants for costs. From, the order confirming the report of the commissioners and said judgment for costs this appeal was taken.

This is a case relating to the revenue and this court can not take jurisdiction of it: Potwin v. Johnson, 106 Ill. 532; The People, etc., v. Springer, Ibid. 542; Herhold v. City of Chicago, Ibid. 547; Webster v. The People, etc., 98 Ill. 343.

The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ill. App. 382, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlierbach-v-city-of-pana-illappct-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack