Schlien v. Securities & Exchange Commission

63 F. App'x 523
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 13, 2003·No. No. 02-1228·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record from the Securities and Exchange Commission and on the briefs of counsel. It is

ORDERED that the petition for review be denied. Although the petitioners had a constitutional right to withhold the financial disclosure statements required by 17 C.F.R. § 201.410(c) on the basis of an asserted privilege against self-incrimination, the claim of privilege did not relieve the petitioners of their burden of production under the regulation.1 See United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. 752, 758-61, 103 S.Ct. 1548, 75 L.Ed.2d 521 (1983). Accordingly, the Commission acted neither arbitrarily nor capriciously in drawing an adverse inference-that the petitioners have the funds to pay disgorgement-from their withholding of such financial information. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); see Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318, 96 S.Ct. 1551, 47 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976). Given that federal agencies need not defer civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings, United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 11, 90 S.Ct. 763, 25 L.Ed.2d 1 (1970); SEC v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 628 F.2d 1368, 1375 (D.C.Cir.1980), the Commission likewise acted neither arbitrarily nor capriciously in denying the petitioners’ request to postpone production of the required financial disclosures, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for re[524] hearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlien v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 63 F. App'x 523 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 523 (Schlien v. Securities & Exchange Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kordel
397 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Baxter v. Palmigiano
425 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Rylander
460 U.S. 752 (Supreme Court, 1983)