Schlicht v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schlicht v. Hults

27 A.D.2d 671, 279 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 671 (Schlicht v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlicht v. Hults, 27 A.D.2d 671, 279 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, which suspended for 10 days petitioner’s automobile dealer’s license. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 6, 1965, the proceeding was transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, with costs. Although we find the evidence insufficient to support the determination of a violation of section 415 (subd. 9, par. c) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law with respect to replacement of the idler arm, the evidence is more than sufficient to sustain the determination as to the other charges. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, which suspended for 10 days petitioner’s automobile dealer’s license. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 6, 1965, the proceeding was transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, with costs. Although we find the evidence insufficient to support the determination of a violation of section 415 (subd. 9, par. c) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law with respect to replacement of the idler arm, the evidence is more than sufficient to sustain the determination as to the other charges. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 671, 279 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlicht-v-hults-nyappdiv-1967.