Schleuning v. Duffy

37 Tex. 527
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Tex. 527 (Schleuning v. Duffy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schleuning v. Duffy, 37 Tex. 527 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker, J.

An effort is made in this case to obtain a new trial by bill of review. We do not think a bill of review, for matters of fact or errors of law apparent upon the face of the record, will lie in our courts. The remedy is by appeal or writ of error. (See Seguin v. Maverick, 24 Texas, 534, and Yturri v. McLeod, 26 Texas, 87.)

A motion was made in the original cause for a new trial, and overruled. Notice of appeal was entered, and the appeal should haye been prosecuted to this court. This ease falls within the rule of Metzger v. Wendler, decided at the last term. (35 Texas, 378.) The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Dallas Petroleum, Inc. v. Hawkins
727 S.W.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Talbert v. Barbour
40 S.W. 187 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Tex. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schleuning-v-duffy-tex-1873.