Schleuning v. Duffy

37 Tex. 527
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

An effort is made in this case to obtain a new trial by bill of review. We do not think a bill of review, for matters of fact or errors of law apparent upon the face of the record, will lie in our courts. The remedy is by appeal or writ of error. (See Seguin v. Maverick, 24 Texas, 534, and Yturri v. McLeod, 26 Texas, 87.)

A motion was made in the original cause for a new trial, and overruled. Notice of appeal was entered, and the appeal should haye been prosecuted to this court. This ease falls within the rule of Metzger v. Wendler, decided at the last term. (35 Texas, 378.) The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schleuning v. Duffy, 37 Tex. 527 (Tex. 1873).

37 Tex. 527 (Schleuning v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Dallas Petroleum, Inc. v. Hawkins
727 S.W.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Talbert v. Barbour
40 S.W. 187 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)