Schlesinger v. Mukasey

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 3, 2009·No. Civil Action No. 2008-1668·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nat Schlesinger, : : Petitioner, : v. : Civil Action No. 08-1668 (CKK) : Michael Mukasey et al., : : Respondents. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus action filed pro se, petitioner, a federal prisoner, seeks to compel the

United States Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New

York to “investigate and prosecute” offenses allegedly committed by individuals involved in his

criminal prosecution. Petition for Writ of Mandamus at 1. He accuses said individuals of

obstruction of justice, perjury, witness tampering and subordination of perjury. Petitioner also

seeks a declaratory judgment to establish his rights. Id. The United States Attorney General has

absolute discretion in deciding whether to investigate claims for possible criminal or civil

prosecution. As a general rule applicable to the circumstances of this case, such decisions are not

subject to judicial review. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480-81 (D.C. Cir.

1995). The complaint therefore must be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the

Court to dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction). A

separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

__________s/s_________________ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge

Date: March 3, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlesinger v. Mukasey, (D.D.C. 2009).

Schlesinger v. Mukasey (Schlesinger v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related