Schlesinger v. Haase

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schlesinger v. Haase

97 N.Y.S. 1146

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 2, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We fail to see any just fication for the referee’s finding. Plaintiff services were rendered to and accepted by tb bank. They were peculiarly for the benefi of the bank and the board of directors express ly ratified the employment. The fact tha Rothschild, the president, personally advance the salary, is of no consequence, as it appear to have been expressly understood that he wa to be reimbursed by the bank. As there i [1147]*1147o contradictory proof, the judgment should e reversed, and judgment for the defendant, ■ith costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We fail to see any just fication for the referee’s finding. Plaintiff services were rendered to and accepted by tb bank. They were peculiarly for the benefi of the bank and the board of directors express ly ratified the employment. The fact tha Rothschild, the president, personally advance the salary, is of no consequence, as it appear to have been expressly understood that he wa to be reimbursed by the bank. As there i [1147]*1147o contradictory proof, the judgment should e reversed, and judgment for the defendant, ■ith costs.

Schlesinger v. Haase, 97 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

97 N.Y.S. 1146 (Schlesinger v. Haase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.