Schlesinger v. Haase

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schlesinger v. Haase

97 N.Y.S. 1146

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.Y.S. 1146 (Schlesinger v. Haase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlesinger v. Haase, 97 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We fail to see any just fication for the referee’s finding. Plaintiff services were rendered to and accepted by tb bank. They were peculiarly for the benefi of the bank and the board of directors express ly ratified the employment. The fact tha Rothschild, the president, personally advance the salary, is of no consequence, as it appear to have been expressly understood that he wa to be reimbursed by the bank. As there i [1147]*1147o contradictory proof, the judgment should e reversed, and judgment for the defendant, ■ith costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We fail to see any just fication for the referee’s finding. Plaintiff services were rendered to and accepted by tb bank. They were peculiarly for the benefi of the bank and the board of directors express ly ratified the employment. The fact tha Rothschild, the president, personally advance the salary, is of no consequence, as it appear to have been expressly understood that he wa to be reimbursed by the bank. As there i [1147]*1147o contradictory proof, the judgment should e reversed, and judgment for the defendant, ■ith costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlesinger-v-haase-nyappterm-1906.