Schlesinger v. Beard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Schlesinger v. Beard

14 F. 687, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

DecidedDecember 29, 1882

DocketNo. 1546; No. 1548

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F. 687 (Schlesinger v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlesinger v. Beard, 14 F. 687, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809 (circtdma 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Lowell, C. J.

These cases are submitted on agreed facts, which require me to decide whether the punchings and clippings of wrought-iron boiler-plates and wrought sheet-iron, left after the manufacture of the boiler-plates into boilers was completed, is dutiable at eight dollars a ton as wrought scrap-iron. If so, the importers are right; if not, the duty charged by the collector is rightly charged. The statute is Bev. St. § 2504, Schedule E, p. 466: “Wrought scrap-iron of every description, eight dollars per ton. But nothing shall be deemed scrap-iron except waste or refuse iron that has been in actual use, and is fit only to be remanufactured.”

It is agreed that this is waste iron, fit only to be remanufactured. The only question is whether it has been in actual use. I do not find any recognized meaning of the words “actual use” which can be fairly applied to this new scrap-iron. The plates from which it was punched or clipped were new, and had been in no actual use, and I cannot discover any use to which the clippings have been put, any more than I can any to which they may be put hereafter until they they are remanufactured.

The statute seems irrational and harsh, but plain. The subject is thoroughly considered, and the various statutes, down to the Bevised Statutes, are compared by Judge Devens in his opinion on one of these cases, in 16 Op. Atty. Gen. 445, with which I concur. The orders will be:

In No. 1546, judgment for the defendants for costs.

In No. 1548, judgment for the plaintiffs for $1,611.92, and interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowell, C. J.

These cases are submitted on agreed facts, which require me to decide whether the punchings and clippings of wrought-iron boiler-plates and wrought sheet-iron, left after the manufacture of the boiler-plates into boilers was completed, is dutiable at eight dollars a ton as wrought scrap-iron. If so, the importers are right; if not, the duty charged by the collector is rightly charged. The statute is Bev. St. § 2504, Schedule E, p. 466: “Wrought scrap-iron of every description, eight dollars per ton. But nothing shall be deemed scrap-iron except waste or refuse iron that has been in actual use, and is fit only to be remanufactured.”

It is agreed that this is waste iron, fit only to be remanufactured. The only question is whether it has been in actual use. I do not find any recognized meaning of the words “actual use” which can be fairly applied to this new scrap-iron. The plates from which it was punched or clipped were new, and had been in no actual use, and I cannot discover any use to which the clippings have been put, any more than I can any to which they may be put hereafter until they they are remanufactured.

The statute seems irrational and harsh, but plain. The subject is thoroughly considered, and the various statutes, down to the Bevised Statutes, are compared by Judge Devens in his opinion on one of these cases, in 16 Op. Atty. Gen. 445, with which I concur. The orders will be:

In No. 1546, judgment for the defendants for costs.

In No. 1548, judgment for the plaintiffs for $1,611.92, and interest and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F. 687, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlesinger-v-beard-circtdma-1882.