Schler v. Weiss

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schler v. Weiss

541 So. 2d 166, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1939, 1989 WL 33978

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1371

StatusPublished

This text of 541 So. 2d 166 (Schler v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schler v. Weiss, 541 So. 2d 166, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1939, 1989 WL 33978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly determined the merits of this case by summary judgment for the defendant. There is no basis, however, for deducting from the amounts admittedly due the plaintiff his alleged “pro rata share of the expenses” involved either in collecting the funds in question or in attorney’s fees. The provision for a set-off for these amounts as provided in paragraph 1(0 is stricken from the final judgment which is otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly determined the merits of this case by summary judgment for the defendant. There is no basis, however, for deducting from the amounts admittedly due the plaintiff his alleged “pro rata share of the expenses” involved either in collecting the funds in question or in attorney’s fees. The provision for a set-off for these amounts as provided in paragraph 1(0 is stricken from the final judgment which is otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 So. 2d 166, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1939, 1989 WL 33978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schler-v-weiss-fladistctapp-1989.