Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.

71 A. 1053, 222 Pa. 470, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 897
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1909·No. Appeal, No. 135·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It is the settled law of Pennsylvania that any negligence of [472]*472a party injured, which contributed to his injury, bars his recovery of damages without regard to the negligence either greater or less than his own, of the other party. The present is a clear case of contributory negligence within this rule. The evidence is indisputable that the unfortunate decedent not only attempted to make the coupling in a dangerous way when his attention was directly called to a safer way, but also did it with reckless disregard of his personal safety by raising his head though twice expressly cautioned at the time as to the danger of so doing.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co., 71 A. 1053, 222 Pa. 470, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 897 (Pa. 1909).

71 A. 1053 (Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. Pennsylvania Railroad
123 A. 676 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Decker v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
57 Pa. Super. 432 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)