Schleicher v. Schleicher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schleicher v. Schleicher

343 S.W.3d 774, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005, 2011 WL 3273580

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 2, 2011

DocketWD 72825

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 S.W.3d 774 (Schleicher v. Schleicher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schleicher v. Schleicher, 343 S.W.3d 774, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005, 2011 WL 3273580 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Schleicher appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to compel arbitration in a lawsuit that Steven Schleicher filed against him. He claims the trial court was required to stay the court proceedings and compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. He bases this on the contention that there is an agreement to arbitrate and the dispute is within the scope of the agreement. Finding no agreement to arbitrate, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Schleicher appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to compel arbitration in a lawsuit that Steven Schleicher filed against him. He claims the trial court was required to stay the court proceedings and compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. He bases this on the contention that there is an agreement to arbitrate and the dispute is within the scope of the agreement. Finding no agreement to arbitrate, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 S.W.3d 774, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005, 2011 WL 3273580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schleicher-v-schleicher-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack