Schlegel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schlegel v. State

208 So. 2d 835, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5827

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 1968

DocketNo. 67-618

StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 2d 835 (Schlegel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlegel v. State, 208 So. 2d 835, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in personal injury and property damage. His contention here is that the evidence was not sufficient to identify him as the driver of the automobile involved. We consider the evidence of identity to be sufficient. See Hyman v. State, 152 Fla. 446, 12 So.2d 437 (1943). See also the principle set forth in Beck v. State, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143 (1940).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in personal injury and property damage. His contention here is that the evidence was not sufficient to identify him as the driver of the automobile involved. We consider the evidence of identity to be sufficient. See Hyman v. State, 152 Fla. 446, 12 So.2d 437 (1943). See also the principle set forth in Beck v. State, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143 (1940).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 So. 2d 835, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlegel-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack