Schlegel v. State
208 So. 2d 835, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5827
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in personal injury and property damage. His contention here is that the evidence was not sufficient to identify him as the driver of the automobile involved. We consider the evidence of identity to be sufficient. See Hyman v. State, 152 Fla. 446, 12 So.2d 437 (1943). See also the principle set forth in Beck v. State, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143 (1940).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schlegel v. State, 208 So. 2d 835, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
208 So. 2d 835 (Schlegel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyman v. State
12 So. 2d 437 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Beck v. State
195 So. 143 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)